Dear Reader,
For two reasons, I decided to move the Parasite Pitch to a later and to-be-determined date. The first reason is that, I mean, it’s Oscar season! If I didn’t write a preview now, when would I? The second reason is also timing-related; I’ll tell you more about that soon.
Below are my Oscar picks for some of the “major” awards. For each, I’ll give betting advice (for entertainment purposes only) for those who want to clean up and impress their friends at their Oscar watch parties. Then I’ll imagine how it would go if I were the Emperor of the Academy. Then I’ll add a few comments.
Enjoy!
Best Actor
If I had to bet: Cillian Murphy, Oppenheimer
If I were in charge: Paul Giamatti, The Holdovers
Comments: I’m a big fan of Murphy’s work generally. And because that’s true, I feel comfortable saying that his turn as Oppenheimer isn’t his best work; it’s not even his best work in a Christopher Nolan film. (I think his performances in Dunkirk and Inception are better. And yes, I get that those roles do not come with the same degree of difficulty as this one does.) So much of Oppenheimer’s story hinges on him being as charismatic and enthusiastic in some moments as he is withdrawn and driven in others. And I just don’t think we got enough of that range. Giamatti, on the other hand, is as stirring as ever; he plays principled (and very bad!) teacher and humiliated human very well.
Best Actress
If I had to bet: Emma Stone, Poor Things
If I were in charge: Sandra Hüller, Anatomy of a Fall
Comments: Hüller is riveting, and, in so many moments, it’s impossible to say for certain what she’s thinking and feeling. Stone is very good in Poor Things. But as my esteemed colleague Justin Brown put it, her arc has a stakes problem: she’s able to shrug off too many things, and not enough matters enough to her. I should also add, as I’ve said before: Natalie Portman in May December might have been the best performance I saw all year. (I’ll also add: I’m growing more and more confident that I didn’t like the movie itself.)
Best Supporting Actor
If I had to bet: Robert Downey, Jr., Oppenheimer
If I were in charge: Christopher Melton, May December
Comments: Look, I still don’t like May December, but Melton’s performance is better than any nominee’s in this especially weak field. Seriously, there’s not one memorable performance of the nominees. I don’t even like Robert Downey, Jr.’s performance, and I love him. One more thing: as they say on the internet, with this category, the Academy has the chance to do the funniest thing ever. (Give the award to Ryan Gosling.)
Best Supporting Actress
If I had to bet: Emily Blunt, Oppenheimer
If I were in charge: Da’vine Joy Randolph, The Holdovers
Comments: Randolph plays a stereotypical role without becoming a stereotype. I think she’s really good in that movie. I wouldn’t be crushed if Blunt wins; I would be disappointed, though, if America Ferrera somehow wins.
Best Adapted Screenplay
If I had to bet: Oppenheimer
I I were in charge: Oppenheimer
Comments: First, calling Barbie an adapted screenplay doesn’t seem quite fair or accurate. Adapted from what? I don’t love Oppenheimer, but I do think it’s the best of the nominees. As I’ve mentioned before, I’ll be disappointed if Poor Things wins. That story had so many chances to take big swings at very fraught material; and the story just seems to watch pitches sail over the middle of the plate. Speaking of which, the more I read about the source material for American Fiction, the more I feel confident that the Academy has another chance to do the funniest thing ever. (Give the award to American Fiction.) (I’ll explain more in a future Pitch for American Fiction.)
Best Original Screenplay
If I had to bet: The Holdovers
If I were in charge: Anatomy of a Fall
Comments: This was the toughest category to call for me—in terms of betting action and favorite. I think there’s a non-zero chance that May December could win; and I think there’s a non-zero chance I actually think it should win. And I don’t even like the movie. (I know, I know: I doth protest too much.) Because this category is safe from the Oppenheimer blitz, I do look at it as a chance to throw a bone to a very good and otherwise-awardless film. I wouldn’t be unhappy if any of the nominees won.
Best Visual Effects
If I had to bet: The Creator
If I were in charge: Godzilla Minus One
Comments: I wouldn’t feel confident betting on The Creator. I love both of these movies and the way they look. I will say that Guardians of the Galaxy: Volume 3 has a fight sequence that was as much of a visual effects achievement as anything I saw. The only way I’ll be disappointed is if Mission: Impossible: Dead Reckoning: Part One or Napoleon wins.
Best Animated Feature
If I had to bet: Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse
If I were in charge: Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse
Comments: I have neither strong feelings about nor strong insights into this category this year. Of the nominees, Spider-Man was the only one I saw. And, not to be a hater: it’s not that great. It’s gorgeous, yes, a sumptuous feast for the senses. And I love the side characters, especially Spider-Punk. But the original was just so much better.
Best Director
If I had to bet: Christopher Nolan, Oppenheimer
If I were in charge: Justine Triet, Anatomy of a Fall
Comments: This one will bum me out, because Oppenheimer isn’t Nolan’s best work. I mean, I still consider his lack of a nomination for Inception one of the most glaring snubs of the 21st century. Oppenheimer is an achievement, for sure. But the scene everyone raves about—his out-of-body experience as the crowd roars in approval after his speech—is pretty heavy-handed. And, come on. Did it have to be that long? Its last few minutes are wonderful. But it sure takes a long time to get there. Anatomy of a Fall, on the other hand, feels like a taut two-and-a-half hours. Triet does so often what I’ve always loved about Tarantino at his best: get the absolute most of a given scene.
Best Picture
If I had to bet: Oppenheimer
If I were in charge: Anatomy of a Fall
Comments: What else can I say? Justin Brown told me early on that Anatomy of a Fall was great; and, as usual, he was right. It’s the best movie I saw this year.
See you on March 20th, when we discussed Interstellar (2014). (Editor’s note: it’ll be either that or Parasite.)
I'm choosing to believe the tense choice here was a reference to Interstellar's own chronological creativity.
"See you on March 20th, when we discussed Interstellar (2014)"
Some disorganized thoughts:
- Are you sure you don't like May December? Are you really, really sure? The evidence in this post suggest otherwise...
- That being said, I'm not sure I liked it all that much either. But 100% agreed that Melton deserves the Oscar. But also not upset at RDJ getting one. Good on him for escaping the Marvel gulag, even if he was one of its architects.
- Paul Giamatti also deserves the Oscar, I agree, but it's Cillian's year. Between him and Jeffrey Wright in American Fiction, I feel like we're entering a golden age of beloved character actors playing depressed teachers and that's giving me hope for the future of cinema.
- Da'Vine Joy Randolph is definitely winning over Blunt, especially after winning the SAG award. Which is, agreed, the right pick.
- I didn't particularly like Anatomy of a Fall, and I'm a little confused what everyone else sees in it. My disappointment probably has to do with that big showy flashback of the argument -- it broke with the otherwise very objective, real-time-feeling movie and gave us something that felt too perfectly and theatrically designed to be a Big Scene. It had characters yelling themes and character analysis at each other, which is something I tend not to like. And because we got the privileged viewpoint/flashback for that scene and that scene only, it made the ambiguity of the ending feel more manufactured than organic. It was the fulcrum of the movie and fell flat for me so the whole thing didn't quite work. That being said, yes, it was a very well made movie, even if my my main takeaway from the whole thing was "damn, French courts have no rules, huh?"
- The Creator's effects were impressive for its budget but man, what a slog of a movie. It really was Concept Art: The Movie.
- I loved Godzilla Minus One but some of the CGI, especially in the Tokyo sequences, were pretty dodgy. As to be expected from a smaller-budget movie. The real deserved winner for this one is Oppenheimer and it's bizarre that it didn't get nominated. But I guess this has become the CGI award.
- While I agree that Oppenheimer isn't Nolan's best movie (still probably Memento), that's how the Oscars work, isn't it? The Departed isn't Scorcese's best, No Country for Old Men isn't the Coens' best either (although I know people disagree).
- I could've used an extra thirty minutes of Oppenheimer. Long live long movies!